This blog's purpose? I'm not entirely sure myself. Perhaps it's for petty musings? Literary criticism? Theatrical brainstorming? Obnoxious ramblings? Stupid shit? I guess I'll have to see where this goes...
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Ok, I'm Serious This Time
Anyway, despite the fact that I'm unemployed (stupid f***king economy), I have been busy the past few weeks. I helped my theater company put up a show in Manhattan at the East to Edinburgh festival. Here's the link if you don't believe me: http://easttoedinburgh.com/2009/midsummer.html
And yeah, it really was as corny as the title sounds (A Midsummer Night's Dream A Rock Musical?!?!?!?! wtf?). But it was fun hanging out with old friends and meeting people.
I also met the funniest woman on the planet - Carolyn Castiglia. She did the one-woman show "Brown Ambition", and it was hysterical. I mean, most one person shows are like autobiographies (egotistical catalysts for an artist to rant and rave about themselves). But this was honest, gutsy, and just plain hysterical. So, Carolyn, rest assured that the next time you're performing in NYC, I'm going to be there and drag a million friends with me.
And that's been life so far. Now I'm just chilling at home, bored, and making a list of what I need to bring with me to college. Oh yeah! Did I forget to mention that I'm finally going to college?! *cough**cough* YAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
Ok, I'm done being obnoxious. See ya later imaginary followers!
Sunday, May 24, 2009
My Love Affair With Sinfest.com
Saturday, May 23, 2009
How College Admissions Actually Works
I’ve come to the conclusion that admissions officers pick students via the enie-minie-miney-moe game.
How did I come to this conclusion? Well, this has basically been my college admissions experience this year. Some colleges I put a lot of effort into. Either I sent emails to teachers/admissions officers or I made sure my theater audition was freakin’ awesome. I even did this for one of my “safeties”, because they have a really kick-ass theater program. Other colleges I put very little, if any, effort into. Either I never made any correspondance what so ever, or I didn’t have to audition.
Well, here’s what happened. The schools I put the most effort into flat out rejected me. The schools I put a decent or little amount of effort into put me on their wait list (including that dumb safety). The schools I put absolutely no effort into not only accepted me but dumped a crapload of money into my lap.
Ok, so maybe admissions officers don’t play enie-meenie-miny-moe, but whatever they do lacks order and common sense. Seriously people, what gives? And if you or a friend are an admissions officer, I don’t mean to insult you or anything. But, how in the world does this make any sense?
Seriously
Friday, December 5, 2008
The Truth About Santa
I thought this was pretty cute, and clever. Of course, I can't understand how an 8 year old could possibly understand that letter. But, I'm sure that as she grew up the letter started to take on a whole new meaning for her. It's a great message, I think. Besides, it's so adorable that an 8 year old wrote to a newspaper to ask about Santa Clause :P
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Human Nature?
Now, I'm not trying to criticize ANYONE. I do this all of the time. I'm sure we all do. But, it's a shame, isn't it, that we have all of this opportunity to communicate and we seem to take it for granted?
A New Kind of Host
I thought this was an interesting tidbit of news. The media seems to come up with new ideas all the time, even if they seem arbitrary or simple. I mean, who would think that a singing TV show host was new or innovative?
A Long Ignored Poem
Those who wish bring joy.
Those who dream have the world.
We wish in words.
We dream in shades,
Shades of the world we see, the way we see it
A wish asks.
A dream does.
The dream we think
Is a wish on wheels.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Consequences
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Poetry Exposure
I also saw Ted Kooser. He writes some great stuff as well, and he has a cute book on love poems. He's also one hysterical dude. I've always liked his work, and he has an amazing history.
The only major dissapointment for me was Tracy K. Smith. She writes beautifully, but god is she boing to listen to.
So, thanks to Thursday, I'm now working on some new ideas, but I'm not putting any of them out as I dont' want to post anything crappy like much of what I've written before :P
Thursday, September 11, 2008
New Yorker Recognition
Anyway, I didn't personally lose any friends or family in the 9/11 incident, but I sympathise with those who do since, well, I have lost family members on other occasions and for the first 24 hours after the airplanes crashed I didn't know if my brother or sister were alive. It was a frightening time for everyone and I'd like to give my sympathies to those who are reminded again today of all they have lost.
Philosophy Versus Political Parties
Liberalism is the idealism that is new or revolutionary for the day. A liberal person believes in ideals that are not widely accepted (i.e. gay marriage, immigrant rights, universal health care, pro-choice, higher taxes, etc.) and that personal liberty is most important. Conservatism is the idealism that is "old" or widley accepted by the majority of the public (i.e. pro-life, smaller taxes, anti-gay rights, restricted immigrant rights, etc.) and they believe tradition is most important. This means that the role of a political party changes depending on the stand they take on social and economic issues. Today Democrats are stereotypically liberal and Republicans are stereotypically conservative. However, back in the 1860's, the Republicans were the liberal party and Democrats were the conservative party. The only thing that consistantly defines a Democrat or Republican is their view on the proper role of government.
In fact, this is the only factor that has stayed consistant throughout America's history. Politicians have been arguing about the role of government since the conception of The Constitution - federalists wanted a larger government, and anti-federalists wanted a smaller government. To some extent, these are now the parties that exist today, except under different names. Keep in mind that I'm leaving out a lot of history for simplicity's sake, but it's undeniable that this central arguement has been pivital within the past 221 years.
Otherwise, I think teachers need to make a point to explain to their students that Democratic-conservatives and Republican-liberals DO exist. You can believe that government should have a bigger role in people's lives but that a woman should not abort their children. You can believe that government should play a smaller role in America and believe that gays should have every right to marry. There is a difference between a political party and a political philosophy. The problem is Americans today seem to mesh the two ideas as if they're the same thing.
Now, that's not to say that I wasn't one of these Americans myself. I was extraordinarilly naive to this difference until just a while ago. But, the fact that I didn't understand this essential difference scares me, especially since I know I'm not the only one. We're living in this country and yet we don't understand the basic principles of how our politics work. Scarier still is that teachers don't even adress this issue. They leave students to believe stereotypes they take as truth, some even reinforce it.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
A Non-Stereotypical Rant
Tell me this isn't over
Too much has been done
For this to be a phase
Just one of those
Passing games
Tell me there is no end
For I fear the risk
Of becoming one of those fools
Who lets sweet moments as these
Come to only memory
For here we've become princes
No longer society's paupers
Free to our mind's content
Free to heart's desire
Tell me this will live
As a journey we'll embark together
That this will not die in memory
But grow in our history
As we grow closer still
For here we are friends
Not convenient acquaintances
Forever to grow
Forever to love
Through tears, through smiles
Through anger, through laughs
Through joy, through silence
We've stayed, we've loved
Tell me this isn't over
Tell me there is no end
Tell me this will live
Tell me this is home
I still haven't figured out a title for this one, but let me give you some background information on it. I was invited to studdy at Cambridge University (in England) for a month this summer, and I made some really close friends on that trip. I also really changed as a person, or, really, I became more comfortable with myself. It was the most "me" I had felt in a really long time, and I didn't want to leave the people who had made helped me reach this stage in my self exploration. They were also just really awesome kids who I wanted to take home with me and continue to do rediculous things with :D
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Poci Again!
Sunday, June 29, 2008
The News Site With Layers
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
A Difficult Subject
I found this today on the front page of the New York Times, and at first it shocked me. How could the Supreme Court be so liberal on such a heinous crime like rape (and I'm a liberal myself). I don't think giving someone the death penalty for raping a child is in any way unconstitutional. First of all, it's rape for christ's sake. How is robbing a child of their innocence or violating someone's body any less damaging or horrifying than murder (other than the death part)?
However, as I continued to read I realized isn't life in prison with out parole just as bad if not worse than the death penalty? I mean, this is kind of harsh, but at least with the death penalty...you 're dead. Yes there's the horror of knowing you're going to die, but at least then the torment would end. Life with out parole is just a never ending torture. You live in a disgusting, tiny, inhabitable little cell, all by yourself, with no one to talk to other than the guard who escorts you. And you have to live, every day, with the memory of your mistake and wishing it never happened, and thanks to you're stupidity, you may as well be in hell.
Of course, there is the deranged criminal who has no feeling or soul, so either way doesn't make a difference because either A) they want to be dead, or B) they have no shame. I don't really know what I'm trying to say with this one, only I guess that with some it probably wouldn't matter. Thus the idea that life with out parole is bad or worse is irrelevant since it wouldn't matter?
But, again on the pro side of this court ruling, as one of the people interviewed mentioned in the article, removing the possibility of the death sentence removed the victim's wait for the punishment to go underway. Thus it removes the tension and drama of the whole process. Instead the case is over and you know that those conditions could start immediately. There isn't this constant reminder that the criminal who hurt you or your child still has yet to receive their proper punishment. That is, if you think life in jail with out parole is good enough of a punishment in your opinion.
However, there's still the factor that possibly this criminal has committed numerous sex offenses and other such crimes in the past. With all of the damage they've done to numerous people and/or children, I especially don't think that the death penalty is unconstitutional. This person has ruined so many people's lives that they may as well deserve to be on death row.
Monday, June 23, 2008
Awesome Video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=P1xLRJY6III&feature=related
Monday, June 16, 2008
Poci
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
The Truth of A Rose
A rose is a rose is just a rose
A stem with some petals
A pretty scented thing
And oh! how it is so dearly praised
The representation
Of love, of affection
But that's all it is, a mere symbol
'Tis not the love you share
'Tis not the one you love
I wish to love not with roses
But with my soul, with heart
For that is truly love